deviant art

Deviant Login Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×

×
That new crop of foreign stealth fighters that's emerging; don't worry, the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet can handle 'em. That's the interesting pitch that Boeing's man in Tokyo for fighters gave me earlier this month while discussing Japan's F-X fighter contest. I suspect that's Boeing's main pitch for many of it's potential fighter customers.

Basically, the Super Hornet's active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar — and it's ability to jam enemy radars and electronic countermeasures — combined with the jet's infrared search and track (IRST) system will allow it to compete with low-observable jets, said Phil Mills, director of Boeing's F-X program in an interview just days before Boeing lost that contest to Lockheed Martin's stealthy F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.
(IRST systems have been around for decades, they use an infrared sensor to allow a pilot to ID and lock onto a target's heat signature rather than radar signature.)

Here's his pitch as to why the newest versions of the Super Hornet will be a viable competitor to the latest stealth jets:

"IRST expands our frequency spectrum of sensor coverage so that it gives us much better counter-stealth capability than we had with just AESA.
AESA's much better [than older radars] as far as detecting small targets. But, AESA plus IRST gives you the capability of not worrying about targets with low radar cross sections, so you can see those targets and actually establish a weapons-quality track without the radar. You can also cue that AESA, that has two and-a-half to three-times the detection range of the old radar anyway, and it can see further than that if you cue it to look at a very small piece of the sky."

"The Super Hornet is a proven design, with some stealthiness built in, that can be continuously upgraded to survive in 21st Century aerial combat", added Mills.

The F/A-18E/F is an example of "where Boeing has been really successful, not doing clean-sheet developments so much, but evolving proven designs and integrating new technology and putting in new capabilities on more an evolutionary basis as opposed to a revolutionary, let's do a clean sheet, like F-35, and go through all the development pains of a new start," said Mills.

Now, the IRST as a stealth killer could have been Mills' be a last ditch argument to sell the Super Hornet to Japan. Modern stealth jets are designed to mask their heat signatures. After all, 21st Century stealth isn't just about being invisible to radar. Truly stealthy designs limit the amount of heat, electronic signals and even noise emitted by the aircraft in an attempt to make them undetectable.

I'd like to see what happens when one of the new IRST-equipped Block II Super Hornets goes up against an F-22 Raptor or F-35. Remember, a Navy EA-18G Growler electronic attack jet did score a fake kill against a Raptor a couple of years ago.

16,828

0 4 0

Details

Stats

Submitted on
January 1, 2012
Views
16,828 (1 today)
Favourites
0
Comments
4
URL
Thumb
Only verified accounts can report policy violations. Please check your email and click on the verification link.
* Required field
Add a Comment:
 
:iconcommander-fillmore:
I was woundering if you would do a peice for me?
Reply
:iconfirehawk171:
The Super Hornet will never go up against a True Stealth Fighter, the F-18E/F is still a Conventional bird with Limited Stealth features, its not even built on True Stealth Airframe; hell it doesnt even have Supercruise engines. Last thing the Super Hornet has the same maximum speed Restriction as the previous models of the Hornets.

I know Tomcat Drivers that had to switch to the Super Hornet hate the damn bird!!!!
Reply
:iconfirehawk171:
The Super Hornet will never go up against a True Stealth Fighter, the F-18E/F is still a Conventional bird with Limited Stealth features, its not even built on True Stealth Airframe; hell it doesnt even have Supercruise engines. Last thing the Super Hornet has the same maximum speed Restriction as the previous models of the Super Hornets.

I know Tomcat Drivers that had to switch to the Super Hornet hate the damn bird!!!!
Reply
:icontank50us:
=Tank50us Jan 1, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
I don't think the Hornet will make a great fighter against some the recent Stealths taking to the skies. In theory, they could tangle with the J-20, and defeat it, but I don't think they'd hold their own against the Su-50. The Su-50 is after all built by a company KNOWN for developing THE most maneuverable fighters the world has seen outside of the West, making the Su-50 a potentially deadly adversary for anything that can't match/beat its maneuverability potential.

From what I understand, coming from another Viper Driver, (who's the son of a family friend, and is a friggin natural I swear) the F-16 has a higher maneuverability capability then many Eastern Block jets, and the same goes for the it vs a Hornet. Personally, I'd pour money into a well proven, and capable dog-fighter design then a aircraft that has yet to get a single kill (tmk). Or allow Boeing to develop the Silent Eagle, which in itself is based on another proven dog fighter with a perfect Win/Loss record... 104 AA Kills, no AA losses. If they want to modernize, then they need to work with the tried and true, instead of going with what looks/sounds cool.
Reply
Add a Comment: